Why is this all goofy looking? Probably because your browser doesn't support stylesheets or you have an old stylesheet. Try hitting reload or upgrade your browser today.
fatmixx iconFatMixx Logo
?!
Advertising
Latest Featured Video

Looks like a performance at NYU (where she was a student for a few years). She really can sing (though she has a few misses playing the piano). There’s talent there, covered these days in a blond wig/hairdo and heavy makeup. Do your best to ignore the goofy MC, if you can. :)

8:52 AM | 3 comments
Donate
ad for kiva.org which facilitates microloans to small businesses around the world
Support CC - 2007
join EFF!
Advertisement

archives - about - home
This site runs WordPress

Looks like the WHTA carried the day. Unofficial numbers so far are:

Yes: 2939
No: 7893

Voter turnout was 29.4%, which seems respectable for a ballot initiative like this.

It’s unsurprising considering the amount of money the WHTA poured into the campaign. While supporters of the budget (if you can call us that) were relegated to making hand-made signs and carrying them around, the WHTA had nicely printed lawn signs all over town and took out a full page ad on the front page of the local penny paper (you know, the free paper that everyone in your town gets that’s mostly full of ads… our’s is called Trade Winds). They were well organized and mobilized and that earned them a ballot victory today amidst light turnout.

I stand by what I wrote and do believe that this referendum was proposed and asked in a misleading way. On top of that, the WHTA has been amazingly dishonest in their advertising, including that front page ad that hit every house in WH. Even basic factual information, like what the copays are for teacher’s health insurance, were wildly misrepresented in the ads. That’s reprehensible. The town manager, who has been very straightforward with both the WHTA and the town’s budget priorities, had to go so far as to specifically correct the ad (pdf) in a 3 page memo that’s just bullet points of what they got wrong in the ad. Some are serious, some are trivial interpretation issues, but the serious ones are the ones that probably had the most impact when reading the ad. I know I was surprised at the $3.00 copay and the claim that my taxes will go up 125% after 2007. I went and looked up the info, and I wonder how many citizens did the same.

Oh well. My taxes might go down, and the schools will lose another program or two. I guess that makes the homeschoolers that are leading the West Hartford Taxpayers Association happy.

On a serious note, though, this seems like a sign to get more organized. I’m not sure how the WHTA financed their ads, but I suspect enough parents in town will care about programs that matter so if we can figure out how to separate the mill rate questions from the education budget, we’ll be in better shape for the next referendum. For a town that has won the Democracy Challenge Cup (pdf), we can boost turnout and help the voter base get better information.

For those of my readers who read the more nationally focused news, please bear with the local coverage. These issues are important to me and I’ll be writing about them as often as I feel I have something to add. For those West Hartford residents who would rather only read the West Hartford news, click this link and bookmark that page. That will only show stories that fall in the West Hartford category.

Update: I updated the numbers to the latest official count I could find.

9:47 PM | 3 comments

I’m late to writing about this and for that I apologize. Tomorrow, June 12th, the town is holding a public referendum on the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. This vote is extraordinarily important. I want to let everyone know I’m voting yes tomorrow because Heidi and I believe in strong public education, small class sizes, and programs like Quest. I’ve also been paying attention to the debate around the issue and, while both sides have been virulent, the sheer disdain for public schools and public school systems is evident from West Hartford Taxpayer Association (WHTA) members.

I recommend people taking a look at this post on The West Hartford Blog to get a rundown on the issue. I also want to thank WHDad, who runs the West Hartford Blog, for creating a place for people to chat about this issue. It’s been an invaluable resource for me to make heads or tails of the whole budget issue.

If you’re a West Hartford resident and you’re reading this on Tuesday (as I know some of my former coworkers will be), please get to the polls and vote yes after work!. Please get your voice heard so the referendum is as accurate as possible.

I have some meta thoughts on the budget, by the way. This whole process, and the act of cutting funds from the school budget seems to be a weird frankenstein of the original issue.

See, the initial uproar was caused by the release of the new assessments for property in the town. For example, my home’s assessed value went up by $100,000 from the last assessment done by the town many years ago. Obviously, with no changes to the mill rate, my taxes would’ve gone up dramatically. So, the obvious remedy to this is to reduce the mill rate to something that leaves taxes more or less the same as before. Sounds simple, right?

Not so. Using the mill rate as a wedge, it seems some citizens who are upset with the general tax level in West Hartford (we have one of the highest tax rates in the state) started asking for cuts in the general budget, focusing on education and the schools as their primary targets. So, instead of having two conversations about the overall mill rate and whether there’s fat in the school and town budgets, the WHTA has instead clouded both issues in an attempt to drive budget cuts that they feel are necessary.

That’s unfortunate, and it seems unfair to me as many seniors and middle class residents of the town have legitimate concerns about the mill rate. By scaring those folks (or leveraging their existing concerns), the WHTA will be able to achieve something that during any other year they would be unable to pass.

That’s not to say that the WHTA agenda is illegitimate or without merit. I love the fact that they’re taking a close look at the budget and asking hard questions of the schools. In fact, I’ve learned a lot about the budget process and how our town leaders respond to this kind of pressure. What I don’t like is the timing and the way they’ve conflated two completely independent issues.

For that reason alone, I’m voting Yes tomorrow because I’d like to see us get past the mill rate discussion and address the education funding separately and openly without the fear of people losing their homes. Ultimately, these issues are separate and should be treated as such.

Update: The town has laid out their budget cuts in the proposed budget here:

2007-2008 Adopted Budget Summary

You can find your polling place by going here:

West Hartford Voting District Info