I know that a lot of the readers here probably don’t care about Lamont and Lieberman. I ask that you bear with me as I’ve asked CT friends to keep an eye on FM for more info on Lamont and my opinions on the race.
That being said, I’ve noticed that I’m not the only person talking about this primary to a national audience. The debate was covered on MSNBC and CSPAN live. David Brooks wrote a column on the race, and political magazines from The Economist and TNR.
So, a number of blogs have been commenting on the following problem. Explain the difference between these things:
Lamont vs. Lieberman
Toomey vs. Specter (2004 PA Senate)
Laffey vs. Chafee (2006 RI Senate)
Just take a look at why these challengers ran, then compare media coverage. The Lamont race is apparently a “liberal inquisition.” The two races where hard right ideologues ran to upset otherwise solid Republicans are, well, not newsworthy (had you heard about either race before? I bet some of you haven’t)




