If you have a MySpace account, can you head over to the Girl Talk profile and try and download the track “Pure Magic” from the music player? The download link is enabled but I keep timing out trying to receive the file from mp3download.myspace.com. It’s annoying, and it’s been like this for weeks now.

Easily among the more misunderstood concepts about the Internet is the reliability and ability to measure how popular something is. There’s this notion that since one can count hits to one’s web servers, there must exist very accurate measurements of audience metrics. The reality is much more complicated. For example, the web servers are owned by the company running the web site, hardly an impartial bystander in the reporting of audience metrics. Technical issues also make it very difficult to identify humans from automated programs (like search engines). In the end, the methods used for ad rates tend to be a throwback to the way TV ratings are done. While these numbers are considered more reliable than web server stats, they’re not perfect for a number of reasons.

Take a recent example, as MySpace just passed longtime audience leader Yahoo in total pageviews in comScore’s metrics. The announcement has been met with a great deal of skepticism. Ultimately, people who want to live by these numbers, who shift their ad dollars based on who’s “most popular” or “the biggest” need to understand what they’re spending against, and understand the methodology of the measurement firm they choose to consider the final arbiter of these titles. At the end of the day, there really isn’t going to be a 100% accurate count.

I saw Charlie Brooker’s Guardian piece, Supposing … I’m too old for MySpace, on both digg and on techmeme so I had to go read it.

As a fellow 30+ geek who doesn’t use MySpace, I feel the need to chime in. Especially since I’m building a social networking site at work. More on that in a minute.

The reason Brooker feels like he’s “a fumbling old colonel struggling to comprehend his nephew’s digital watch” is that he keeps thinking there’s a hook there, something that ought to appeal to him that doesn’t. The underlying implication is that as a good geek, he should see the draw of MySpace.

There are a couple of fundamental mistakes here. The first is that MySpace has something to do with geekdom and, by extension, technology. It has absolutely nothing to do with either. It has to do with the age group of those that use it and where they are in life. The New Yorker (Me Media, 5/15/06 issue) had one of the best explanations. They talked to a sociologist who believes being on MySpace is the modern alternative to hanging out at the mall for kids. Whatever the manifestation, kids and young adults need to see and be seen and to socialize. MySpace is about how younger people socialize and make friends.

For those of us past this stage of life, whatever our age, MySpace isn’t for us. A 30-year-old would probably feel as out-of-place just hanging out at the mall. Not that you can’t go to MySpace, see bands, get tickets, or whatever. You can still go to the mall. You just don’t hang out there.

The way to build a MySpace for older Internet users is to figure out what types of things adults are interested in having aggregated about them. If you have kids, for example, you might take more pictures of the kids than you do of yourself or your spouse. It might be a subtle difference, but it requires a few different features. I think a lot of different sites have a lot of the pieces, but the grown-up’s social networking site will have all of this functionality in one place.

The second misconception is that MySpace is the “be all, end all” for social networking. Because he doesn’t get MySpace, he must not get the whole social networking “thing.” That seems too simplistic. Sure, the core functionality is fairly common. Friendster, Facebook, Flickr, or LinkedIn all provide the same basic functionality. Adding friends, self-expression, and sharing are really all these sites are about. It’s a personal aggregator of things about you, and in that way, it’s pretty simple. It’s not the technology that sets them apart but the features and the product. “What do you share?” and “Why do you share it?” make all the difference. MySpace has done some smart things on that front which is why they’re so popular. Danah Boyd’s essay examines some of this, by the way, and is a great set of guiding principles for those of us building competitors.

I mentioned above that we’re building a social networking platform at ESPN.com. There is a team of folks here at ESPN.com including a number of folks in senior management who get this stuff. We see some things that we know we can do better than anyone else, so in September, we will launch our new social networking platform. Our plan is to bring out the basics then. Over the following months, you’ll see new features roll out that will make the ESPN.com offering even better.

This is one of the major projects my team is working on right now. I can’t really talk about the features in more detail, but here’s the summary of the September feature set from the Ad Age article:

ESPN is hoping to become the MySpace of the sports world. In September, it will unveil as part of ESPN’s Sports Nation property the tools for fans to create profiles, contribute to sports blogs, post opinions and link to favorite articles.

John Zaccario, VP-digital media sales and marketing at ESPN, revealed the plans to advertisers at a pre-NBA Draft party in Chelsea that also featured an appearance by NBA great (and ESPN basketball analyst) Bill Walton. “We want to make the sports fan the center of ESPN’s universe,” Mr. Zaccari said. ESPN will allow users to personalize their home pages and participate in blogs and discussions around favorite teams and sports.

There are some more features, but this is the general idea for the September launch. Even more features will roll out over the following months. I’m really excited to see how people use the site, and it should be fun to see where the fans take us.

I actually think the headline of the Ad Age article is wrong, by the way. The only way my team wants to be “MySpace for fans” is in our overall audience. Can’t complain about having 50-60+ million uniques, after all. Beyond the basics, though, we’re going to be very different and, I believe, a lot better. We’re very aware that people of all ages are sports fans whether they’re in the heavily courted 18-35 demo or not. We’re doing what we can to appeal to sports fans of all ages whether you’re in the MySpace crowd or not.

I don’t think Brooker will have trouble getting ESPN’s offering, especially if he’s a sports fan.

Want a job?

We still have some openings on this team, by the way, and if you get MySpace and you get sports and you’re a web developer either on the front end (DHTML, JS, PHP/JSP/ASP, AJAX, etc.) or the back end (SQL, Java, C#, etc.), send us your resume. The job description I linked to is for a particular position, but you can find the other open technology positions on our jobs web site. ESPN is an awesome place to work if you love sports.

(Note: Standard disclaimer applies. I work for ESPN, but I’m writing here on my own. Nothing has been approved or sanctioned by anyone at ESPN.com or Disney.)

Users of MySpace are complaining that Fox is censoring content on MySpace. You may remember that Fox bought MySpace. Around the same time, Fox announced a number of moves and products indicating that “they got it” with regard to the Internet. Kareem (now a Fox Interactive Media employee) wrote some pretty glowing things about these moves on his blog.

FIM is in an interesting position, because as far as I can tell, they don’t seem to be getting much interference from their TV and movie businesses. At least, not right now. That pressure is really the key. While I love working at the Walt Disney Internet Group (WDIG or DIG), it’s not really an “Internet company” in the same vein as Google or Yahoo or even MSN. We are first and foremost an organization that helps the core media businesses do their thing (whatever that may be) online. We end up working on similar products as MSN or Yahoo or Google, but we come at it from a completely different angle.

I don’t have a good sense of where FIM is on this divide. I wonder if they’re at the point now where, because they’re so small, the TV and film business units just don’t care about them. DIG at Disney went through a similar phase where our revenues, impressive as they might be for a startup, were not even a blip compared to the revenues from TV and film businesses. When companies start counting revenues in the billions, they don’t care as much about the millions from this little business. When the Internet revenue starts showing up on their radar, the instinct is to protect and grow the billions and not the millions. It’s probably true of most industries, and I’m curious as to how FIM will react to those pressures as they start colliding with the old line business units.

I wonder if the MySpace thing is a sign of that struggle. I’m also curious where they’ll end up in a few years. They are making moves that see like they get it, but will that stand up in the face of the old line business’ pressure?

Update: News.com reports that MySpace.com may have banned another site. This time it’s Revver.com, another video sharing site. Welcome, FIM, to web 1.0.

The panel on the stage right now at Web 2.0 consists of a number of teenagers and an analyst from Piper Jaffray, Safa Rashtchy. The interesting thing so far is that they ALL use MySpace, recently acquired by Fox Interactive Media. I didn’t get MySpace.com and still don’t, really, but since all of the kids up there mentioned that they spend a LOT of time on that site, I guess it was a good purchase for FIM.

The only college student on the panel did say that it’s not as important once you get to college, apparently because Facebook.com takes over. Just thought you’d want to know…

Update: I forgot to mention that one of the kids said he spends $50-60 a month on ringtones. On ringtones. Can you believe that?