Why is this all goofy looking? Probably because your browser doesn't support stylesheets or you have an old stylesheet. Try hitting reload or upgrade your browser today.
fatmixx iconFatMixx Logo
Check out Coolspotters!
Advertising
Latest Featured Video

In some sort of cosmic convergence today, my favorite nerdy show (Heroes) actress, Brea Grant, pointed me at my other favorite nerdy movie (Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy) actress’s band, She & Him. That actress is Zooey Deschanel. The track above is their VMA nominated video for Why Do You Let Me Stay Here?.

I like I Thought I Saw Your Face Today better, so here’s a live recording of them performing this track:

Good stuff. Today has been a music bonanza. The album is Volume One. Click through to buy the album.

3:02 am | leave a comment
Donate

Goal Thermometer

ad for kiva.org which facilitates microloans to small businesses around the world
Support CC - 2007
join EFF!
Advertisement

Tell me again which party is the “law and order” party? Because it sure isn’t the Republican party, and certainly not this administration.

10:45 pm | leave a comment

Via Kevin Drum, we find this posting by a college professor:

I have now received three (3) student papers that discuss Iraq’s attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11. All three papers mention it as an aside to another point. I’ve had two papers on the virtue of forgiveness that argue that if we had just forgiven Iraq for the 9/11 attacks, we wouldn’t be at war right now. I just read a paper on the problem of evil which asked why God allowed “the Iraq’s” to attack us on 9/11.

The thing that upsets me most here is that the the students don’t just believe that that Iraq was behind 9/11. This is a big fact in their minds, that leaps out at them, whenever they think about the state of the world.

The biggest single defining event of our time and people don’t know who was behind this. These are college students. The Bush administration has, I guess, done their job by confusing the world.

Do you know anyone who believes Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks? Please tell me this is a limited phenomenon…

4:41 pm | leave a comment

And the lies from the Press Secretary’s podium continue. Look, you want to talk about Clinton? Al Gore got smacked around by a press repeating RNC press releases because he made a phone call on a government phone using a DNC paid for phone card.

Talk about media bias…

4:47 pm | leave a comment

The first is a followup to Amb. John Bolton’s appearance on the Daily Show the night before.

Reality means nothing to these guys, and John Bolton is example number one. Wikipedia has more on Lincoln’s cabinet as does The University of Illinois at Springfield.

The second clip is John Oliver providing commentary about the White House’s “offer” to have Harriet Miers and Karl Rove testify only if there are no transcripts and they are not under oath.

I thought that was hilarious but then I became a little annoyed. When the Bush administration says F you to Congress in cases like this, they’re saying F You to all of us. Transparency and accountability aren’t simply important between Congress and the Executive but important to help us keep our representatives in government honest.

9:00 pm | leave a comment

It would require acknowledging some form of evolution and limiting what business can do. Any doubts the administration wouldn’t approve it?

6:25 pm | leave a comment

Excerpt:

Well, we’re laughing. Don’t we count? The reason we laugh is that, first of all, even if it were true, this would be a fairly modest achievement. Halving a deficit you inherited would be something to brag about. Halving a deficit you created, not so much. You don’t see Bush’s former chief domestic policy adviser Claude Allen boasting that he has returned half the merchandise he filched from Target. 

Second, it’s not true. In 2004, the Bush administration released a suspiciously high deficit projection for 2004. Every other sentient budget analyst at the time said the number was inflated. (The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, for instance, wrote, “The Administration appears to have noticeably overstated the deficit for the current year, 2004.”) Why would it inflate the number? So that when the real figure came in below its phony prediction, it could claim progress. The trick was utterly obvious at the time. 

8:13 pm | leave a comment