Why is this all goofy looking? Probably because your browser doesn't support stylesheets or you have an old stylesheet. Try hitting reload or upgrade your browser today.
fatmixx iconFatMixx Logo
Check out Coolspotters!
Advertising
Latest Featured Video

This is basically an interview with John Gaeta about the approach taken in the upcoming remake of Speed Racer. The movie looks great, and I’m such a fan of the Wachowski brothers that this is on my must see list. The Matrix and V for Vendetta are among my favorite movies in large part because of the visual and stylistic weight of their films.

3:56 am | 1 comment
Advertisement

Donate

NARAL Pro Choice America endorses Obama and then … Chaos! Read the comment thread. Holy crap are the Clinton people pissed. Perspective folks. Via Cogitamus, which gives the issue a more serious comment than my flip one.

PS. I haven’t forgotten they also endorsed Lieberman, so I’m not really taking sides here. I just think the comment thread is pretty typical of when both sides get into it. This is ugly, and it’s unnecessary. Hillary Clinton has lost this race. It is over, and she should step aside because this is what she’s creating.

11:25 pm | leave a comment

I think this pretty much sums up my response, as well. Below, you have Hilzoy’s reasonable prose, but this link goes to John Cole’s more blunt assessment. Or, as Greenwald said today:

So it isn’t as though we really have anything else to talk about besides Jeremiah Wright. There are some countries in the world—probably most—which have so many big problems that they could ill-afford to devote much time and energy to a matter of this sort. Thankfully, the United States isn’t one of them. I believe it’s critical that we keep that in mind as we discuss him for the next seven months.

Sigh. I’m for Obama, if you haven’t figured it out, but if this were happening to Hillary, I’d be saying the same thing.

11:07 pm | leave a comment

Best rundown I’ve seen today of the Obama/Wright dustup, part 2. Video for both today’s Obama presser and Wright’s ridiculous comments yesterday are either embedded or linked. Good place to start.

Needless to say, since this seems to be the case more often than not, I agree with what Hilzoy says about Wright, Obama, and what this says about both men. (well, except for the ending point… I would not have speculated about that on my blog, though I think the theory is worth examining by people that know these men better).

It also wouldn’t surprise me if more Trinity members came out and publicly took sides in this, like MSNBC’s anchor Tamron Hall. If Wright is truly over-the-top, even for him, other church members should react the way Obama and Hall have: with surprise and shock.

10:54 pm | leave a comment

Nicely done, Newsweek. I guess they’re pulling for Hillary?

12:26 pm | leave a comment

Um, now this is an unexpected idea. I can’t imagine this happening, and I can’t even begin to imagine the confirmation battle.

12:11 am | leave a comment

Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock, you know that Hillary Clinton won in PA yesterday. I’ll repeat what I said earlier, that I don’t see how this ends before the convention. At this point, I beginning to doubt that this ends well for the Democrats in November.

While I think the country is ready for a Democratic administration, and still leans that way, this nomination fight has bloodied both candidates. With Obama now going negative as well, this race will hurt the eventual nominee regardless of who is the winner. At the very least, it has taken Obama off message, and taken the wind out of a lot of supporters. Those of my friends and co-workers that are Obama supporters have lost a lot of the excitement of the early days. For me, at least, the biggest reason has been the wearying nature of this nomination fight. Each non-decisive primary has marked the start of an even more negative campaign. Nothing takes enthusiasm out of supporters than constant bombardment of the candidate, especially from admired figures within the same party.

I also find it frustrating because the system is clearly just completely messed up here. If we went with a winner take all system like the Republicans, Clinton would have the nomination sewed up already. If we went with a simple majority vote/delegate count, Obama would have this locked up. Instead, we have super delegates and proportional apportionment, the worst of both worlds when the party fields two strong candidates.

Finally, after the last few weeks, I’m pretty angry with the Clinton campaign. I know some of you think this is unfair, but this is how I feel. I’m tired of them, and I’m tired of Mark Penn, of Howard Wolfson, and of the nasty, dishonest, Rovian campaigning they’ve been running. I will vote for her if she somehow convinces enough super delegates to support her and wins the nomination, but I won’t enjoy it. She and her campaign have taken all the enjoyment out of what should’ve been a good election year.

I realize it’s silly to worry about “enjoying” the campaign, but it has real effects for me. I certainly won’t volunteer, and I’m unlikely to give her money. Donating to political campaigns annoys my wife (we have different opinions on the role of money in politics), and I’m not willing to annoy her for Hillary Clinton. Perhaps I’ll regret saying this later, but right now, I’m just tired of the whole damn thing, and I can’t imagine what this will feel like in June when the last primary results come through and it’s STILL not resolved.

I also suspect, after reading TalkLeft, that there are Clinton supporters who feel the same way about Obama. And that’s why I think we’re all f’d come November. Four more years of Bush-lite will drive us from crisis to crisis. That should be fun.

(and a clarification on the headline… no more full length posts. I may pass on articles, but I think I’m going to reduce that even further. I really just don’t care anymore.)

2:28 am | leave a comment

I just thought about something today. For the folks that claim that Obama supporters are getting “duped” or are “falling for” the rhetoric of Obama over substance, as if we’re not policy focused enough, as of today, most of the bloggers I was reading before the primary nonsense began have endorsed or said they were voting for Obama.

TalkLeft is the only blog in my regular reading list that has endorsed Clinton, I think. Josh Marshall is a guess, but it seems somewhat obvious he’s leaning Obama (not sure how he voted). Today, Atrios and Amanda Marcotte both wrote about voting for Obama. Kevin Drum at Washington Monthly voted Obama. John Cole has been, um, vocal about his Obama support. I’m not actually sure where Ezra Klein came out, but that forms the core of my “must reads” every day.

These are smart policy people, overly wonkish if anything. And they’ve chosen to vote for Obama. I’m not saying that there’s anything wrong with people that vote for Clinton, but to say that Obama supporters don’t care about policy or are voting blindly for charisma or lofty promises are spinning for their candidate.

12:37 pm | leave a comment

As Josh Marshall said, this is “the old Bill I used to know and love.” And he’s right… you can vote for Hillary, who released a tastefully done commercial with Osama bin Laden and various scary images asking “Who do you think has what it takes?” or you can vote for the guy who has made an effort to keep his campaign above that.

TPM has a video running down the Sunday shows this weekend and I was surprised and a bit appalled to see Ed Rendell saying that at least the Clinton camp wasn’t hypocritical by being negative. As if he’s proud of slinging nasty, negative attacks because, well, they didn’t swear it off.

This race can’t end soon enough for me. Make it stop, PA. Vote Obama.

8:27 pm | leave a comment

I probably won’t write much before Tuesday, so let me get this out of the way now. I think Clinton will win, and will win by 8-10 points. Obama was off during the debate, got gang tackled by the press, Clinton, and McCain, and it stunted his momentum (he had been steadily closing in the polls until “bitter” entered the political lexicon).

Both sides are trying to spin this, but the reality is simple: Clinton wins by less than 10, it’s a disappointment for them, and if Obama loses by more than 10 it’s a disappointment for him. I’m basically calling it a 10 point spread.

Even more fundamental (and obvious): Obama and Clinton both need to win. If Obama wants to shut this down Tuesday, he needs to beat her. If Clinton wants to keep going, she needs to at least win. If she loses, I don’t understand what the point is in staying in.

And that brings me to my suggestions for PA Dems: I’m an Obama supporters, but beyond that, this primary needs to end. There’s nothing new being learned here, and the most likely outcome of the remaining primaries will be Obama with the same proportional lead in delegates and votes. There’s literally no point to this.

I understand the desire to have every state vote, but the system we have has never really allowed that to be the case. And, as I said, barring several landslides of epic proportions, the situation isn’t going to change materially.

These last weeks between the last set of primaries and this upcoming one have been wearying. I’m tired of it. Please make it stop. PA, it’s in your hands. Vote Obama. :)

12:50 am | leave a comment

Ah, was waiting for someone to use this in a campaign mailing. That John McCain fella is one classy dude. BTW, did you know that racists and bigots have endorsed McCain. It’s true. And it matters just as much as who Hamas wants in office… (I’ll let you figure out how important I think it is…)

9:58 pm | leave a comment

So, am I the only one who is FLOORED that The Colbert Report just had on both Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama (via satellite), and John Edwards? It was all silly fun with only the slightest bit of seriousness from John Edwards. His appearance was the most interesting to me, since he came out and said, for the first time on camera, I think, what he’s would like from the candidates in order to secure his endorsement.

Jet skis, in case you were wondering.

(and something about making poverty a key part of their campaign, pledging a minimum wage increase, and some issue called “healthcare” or something).

In all seriousness, I don’t think any other show could’ve set up a triple appearance like that. It’s amazing to me how “serious” the Colbert Report and The Daily Show have become.

12:05 am | leave a comment

Quoting the entire thing:

“If [Republicans] could cut funding for Medicare, Medicaid, education, and the environment, middle-class Americans would see fewer benefits from their tax dollars, feel more resentful paying taxes, and become even more receptive to their appeals for tax cuts and their strategy of waging campaigns on divisive social and cultural issues like abortion, gay rights, and guns.”

– Bill Clinton, in his 2004 memoirs, My Life, making the same argument as Sen. Barack Obama.

10:31 pm | leave a comment

Colin Powell on GMA this AM. The line about Obama’s experience is perfect. Still not able to forget or forgive Powell for his role in leading us into this war, but I still respect his intelligence. It’s too bad he hitched his star to the W machine…

1:00 pm | leave a comment

Interesting and worth passing on. What’s not reported enough is the sheer volume of people donating to Obama’s campaign and the size of the average donation. It’s pretty cool.

1:36 pm | leave a comment

Still reading it, but even the beginning is worth passing on. Via TPM.

10:09 am | leave a comment