I’m late to writing about this and for that I apologize. Tomorrow, June 12th, the town is holding a public referendum on the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. This vote is extraordinarily important. I want to let everyone know I’m voting yes tomorrow because Heidi and I believe in strong public education, small class sizes, and programs like Quest. I’ve also been paying attention to the debate around the issue and, while both sides have been virulent, the sheer disdain for public schools and public school systems is evident from West Hartford Taxpayer Association (WHTA) members.
I recommend people taking a look at this post on The West Hartford Blog to get a rundown on the issue. I also want to thank WHDad, who runs the West Hartford Blog, for creating a place for people to chat about this issue. It’s been an invaluable resource for me to make heads or tails of the whole budget issue.
If you’re a West Hartford resident and you’re reading this on Tuesday (as I know some of my former coworkers will be), please get to the polls and vote yes after work!. Please get your voice heard so the referendum is as accurate as possible.
I have some meta thoughts on the budget, by the way. This whole process, and the act of cutting funds from the school budget seems to be a weird frankenstein of the original issue.
See, the initial uproar was caused by the release of the new assessments for property in the town. For example, my home’s assessed value went up by $100,000 from the last assessment done by the town many years ago. Obviously, with no changes to the mill rate, my taxes would’ve gone up dramatically. So, the obvious remedy to this is to reduce the mill rate to something that leaves taxes more or less the same as before. Sounds simple, right?
Not so. Using the mill rate as a wedge, it seems some citizens who are upset with the general tax level in West Hartford (we have one of the highest tax rates in the state) started asking for cuts in the general budget, focusing on education and the schools as their primary targets. So, instead of having two conversations about the overall mill rate and whether there’s fat in the school and town budgets, the WHTA has instead clouded both issues in an attempt to drive budget cuts that they feel are necessary.
That’s unfortunate, and it seems unfair to me as many seniors and middle class residents of the town have legitimate concerns about the mill rate. By scaring those folks (or leveraging their existing concerns), the WHTA will be able to achieve something that during any other year they would be unable to pass.
That’s not to say that the WHTA agenda is illegitimate or without merit. I love the fact that they’re taking a close look at the budget and asking hard questions of the schools. In fact, I’ve learned a lot about the budget process and how our town leaders respond to this kind of pressure. What I don’t like is the timing and the way they’ve conflated two completely independent issues.
For that reason alone, I’m voting Yes tomorrow because I’d like to see us get past the mill rate discussion and address the education funding separately and openly without the fear of people losing their homes. Ultimately, these issues are separate and should be treated as such.
Update: The town has laid out their budget cuts in the proposed budget here:
2007-2008 Adopted Budget Summary
You can find your polling place by going here:
Leave a Reply