I realize that free syndication is a BIG reason that YouTube has had such explosive growth over it’s other competitors, but I think they could start micro-charging like Amazon is for S3 and make a decent profit. I think people would pay to syndicate YouTube video if it cost pennies per video. That’s just my random light bulb of the day. Maybe keep a lower bound so if you have less than 10 views for a video on your site, it’s free. Then the question is how much of their bandwidth is used off site versus on YouTube itself (I’m assuming that advertising can pick up a large part of the bill for viewers at YouTube). And then how many videos hosted on blogs like FatMixx actually get viewed? If it’s a large percentage with only 1 or 2 views, then maybe this wouldn’t work. But if there are videos with 20-infinity views on average, a small micro-charge per gigabyte might not be terrible.
Just my random thought for the day.








