I saw Charlie Brooker’s Guardian piece, Supposing … I’m too old for MySpace, on both digg and on techmeme so I had to go read it.

As a fellow 30+ geek who doesn’t use MySpace, I feel the need to chime in. Especially since I’m building a social networking site at work. More on that in a minute.

The reason Brooker feels like he’s “a fumbling old colonel struggling to comprehend his nephew’s digital watch” is that he keeps thinking there’s a hook there, something that ought to appeal to him that doesn’t. The underlying implication is that as a good geek, he should see the draw of MySpace.

There are a couple of fundamental mistakes here. The first is that MySpace has something to do with geekdom and, by extension, technology. It has absolutely nothing to do with either. It has to do with the age group of those that use it and where they are in life. The New Yorker (Me Media, 5/15/06 issue) had one of the best explanations. They talked to a sociologist who believes being on MySpace is the modern alternative to hanging out at the mall for kids. Whatever the manifestation, kids and young adults need to see and be seen and to socialize. MySpace is about how younger people socialize and make friends.

For those of us past this stage of life, whatever our age, MySpace isn’t for us. A 30-year-old would probably feel as out-of-place just hanging out at the mall. Not that you can’t go to MySpace, see bands, get tickets, or whatever. You can still go to the mall. You just don’t hang out there.

The way to build a MySpace for older Internet users is to figure out what types of things adults are interested in having aggregated about them. If you have kids, for example, you might take more pictures of the kids than you do of yourself or your spouse. It might be a subtle difference, but it requires a few different features. I think a lot of different sites have a lot of the pieces, but the grown-up’s social networking site will have all of this functionality in one place.

The second misconception is that MySpace is the “be all, end all” for social networking. Because he doesn’t get MySpace, he must not get the whole social networking “thing.” That seems too simplistic. Sure, the core functionality is fairly common. Friendster, Facebook, Flickr, or LinkedIn all provide the same basic functionality. Adding friends, self-expression, and sharing are really all these sites are about. It’s a personal aggregator of things about you, and in that way, it’s pretty simple. It’s not the technology that sets them apart but the features and the product. “What do you share?” and “Why do you share it?” make all the difference. MySpace has done some smart things on that front which is why they’re so popular. Danah Boyd’s essay examines some of this, by the way, and is a great set of guiding principles for those of us building competitors.

I mentioned above that we’re building a social networking platform at ESPN.com. There is a team of folks here at ESPN.com including a number of folks in senior management who get this stuff. We see some things that we know we can do better than anyone else, so in September, we will launch our new social networking platform. Our plan is to bring out the basics then. Over the following months, you’ll see new features roll out that will make the ESPN.com offering even better.

This is one of the major projects my team is working on right now. I can’t really talk about the features in more detail, but here’s the summary of the September feature set from the Ad Age article:

ESPN is hoping to become the MySpace of the sports world. In September, it will unveil as part of ESPN’s Sports Nation property the tools for fans to create profiles, contribute to sports blogs, post opinions and link to favorite articles.

John Zaccario, VP-digital media sales and marketing at ESPN, revealed the plans to advertisers at a pre-NBA Draft party in Chelsea that also featured an appearance by NBA great (and ESPN basketball analyst) Bill Walton. “We want to make the sports fan the center of ESPN’s universe,” Mr. Zaccari said. ESPN will allow users to personalize their home pages and participate in blogs and discussions around favorite teams and sports.

There are some more features, but this is the general idea for the September launch. Even more features will roll out over the following months. I’m really excited to see how people use the site, and it should be fun to see where the fans take us.

I actually think the headline of the Ad Age article is wrong, by the way. The only way my team wants to be “MySpace for fans” is in our overall audience. Can’t complain about having 50-60+ million uniques, after all. Beyond the basics, though, we’re going to be very different and, I believe, a lot better. We’re very aware that people of all ages are sports fans whether they’re in the heavily courted 18-35 demo or not. We’re doing what we can to appeal to sports fans of all ages whether you’re in the MySpace crowd or not.

I don’t think Brooker will have trouble getting ESPN’s offering, especially if he’s a sports fan.

Want a job?

We still have some openings on this team, by the way, and if you get MySpace and you get sports and you’re a web developer either on the front end (DHTML, JS, PHP/JSP/ASP, AJAX, etc.) or the back end (SQL, Java, C#, etc.), send us your resume. The job description I linked to is for a particular position, but you can find the other open technology positions on our jobs web site. ESPN is an awesome place to work if you love sports.

(Note: Standard disclaimer applies. I work for ESPN, but I’m writing here on my own. Nothing has been approved or sanctioned by anyone at ESPN.com or Disney.)

Not that this proves anything, but someone at the DOJ was a recent visitor to FatMixx. The link that they visited was the link to the SWIFT editorial on WashingtonPost.com. The search on Yahoo they performed was just for WashingtonPost.com.

Anyway, random and a bit amusing, all told. For all I know, someone was just looking for a WaPo story who happens to work at the DOJ.

… or are the Knick fans a little, um, I think the word is, pissed at Isaiah Thomas?

James Dobson has a guest editorial about gay marriage on CNN.com. I’m looking forward to the editorial defending gay marriage that I’m certain CNN.com will run any day now.

I wonder how he liked having his head next to the Victoria’s Secret model in the fetching bra.

Update: I found the ad. Look, it’s three boobs!

I’m leaving this fully expanded because my, “Holy F’ing Sh*t!” reaction should be seen by all. And you all know that I hate using profanity on FatMixx. Where do these people come from? Why do they need to blame all of their own problems on an imaginary boogeyman?

As Tamar eagerly awaits the arrival of her MacBook, we (I) am faced with an interesting question: How best to run XP on it.

For Tamar this is a less important question as she can probably ignore Windows (as she has happily done since she got her first Mac at birth). I, however, have to use XP for certain applications. Currently I’m crawling around with VPC, so any of the solutions are an improvement, however the question is which one to use. Both have advantages and disadvantages. Since an XP license isn’t cheap, running both isn’t really an option.

So the question is, Parallels vs Boot Camp?

Parallels has two major advantages: 1) Fast Booting and 2) The ability to have XP and Mac OS running at the same time (as I do with VPC right now).

There are also some minor advantages, such as not partitioning the hard disk.

The major Con is that there is no direct access to the video card. This will limit PC gaming (and I may lose one of the function that I want to have but currently don’t with VPC). The Parrallels GUI is a bit sluggish, which won’t matter for work, but will matter for fun.

Neither support iSight, but I suspect Apple will fix that with the final release.

I guess the answer should be clear, but I’m still stuck on the video card problem. Parallels seems almost ideal…but not quite. Oh yes, and Tamar keeps say, “If I have to infect my computer with Windows, it better run games.” More to follow…

After reading this post at Eschaton, I feel like he’s missing the point Michael Tomasky is making. From Atrios:

The belief that we’ll be mostly out of Iraq in 3 Friedmans is the compainon of the belief that things will get better in one Friedman. If I’m correct, as I think I am, there will not be significant troop reductions this year, or next year, or the following year. It’s possible there will be minor troop reductions, with perpetual promises of more to come between one and three Friedmans from “now,” but they plan to stay and while civil war rages they can’t stay with a small number of troops.

(A “Friedman” is about 6 months)

Atrios is wrong here. As Tomasky says in the original piece:

Ezra and Matt [and Atrios] are making the mistake of discussing substantive factors. You’ve surely learned by now that there is no substance with these people. There is only politics.

I’ve said it before, and Tomasky says it today: Domestic political considerations trump good foreign policy at every turn.

Atrios’s point, that the President wants to stay indefinitely, is probably true. The reality of the matter, though, is that his entire party is going to be up in arms if troops don’t start coming home soon because every poll shows Americans want them to come home. Bush has been spineless on every issue with the possible exception of immigration policy. Faced with any sort of opposition, the President simply shifts positions (dare I say, flip flops?) and finds a way to declare victory.

Which is exactly what Tomasky is predicting this time around. Past performance is an indicator of future performance with Bush, so the salient question is whether Bush cares about staying in Iraq the way he cares about immigration policy. I don’t think he does. Tomasky agrees. Atrios feels otherwise. Time will tell.

Of course, I might point out General Casey’s recent briefing to the President as leaked by anonymous “American officials.” I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the first troops come home in September (4-8 weeks before the midterm elections) and the drawdown will be complete by December 2007. Brace yourself.

I knew this was possible, but I've never, ever seen it. Until now, that is:

That's a legit play. And, it was the game winning run. Amazing.