Why is this all goofy looking? Probably because your browser doesn't support stylesheets or you have an old stylesheet. Try hitting reload or upgrade your browser today.
fatmixx iconFatMixx Logo
Check out Coolspotters!
Latest Featured Video

This is basically an interview with John Gaeta about the approach taken in the upcoming remake of Speed Racer. The movie looks great, and I’m such a fan of the Wachowski brothers that this is on my must see list. The Matrix and V for Vendetta are among my favorite movies in large part because of the visual and stylistic weight of their films.

3:56 am | 1 comment

On Wednesday, I’m off to Asia for five weeks. I have never traveled so far, so long, or so rough. I’ll occasionally find an internet cafe to post some thoughts, but Fatmixx felt like the wrong place (I don’t know all of you, messages too long, other people want to hear the same stuff) so I’ve decided to put up a simple email list. Click here to sign up This’ll save anyone from BS “ooh, that was neat” replies.

The Great Indochina Overland tour is run by Intrepid Travel, who my sister used in Australia and Thailand a few years ago. Intrepid is also recommended by some of my future classmates.

Some Thai fishermen have given me the ultimate conversation piece for my trip. In Chiang Khong (Day 4 of my trip) villagers landed a 646-pound catfish! They pulled it out of the Mekong River (Days 5-6) where I will no longer be dangling my toes.

Please sign up for the mailing list if you’re interested in my silly stories, odd observations, and frequent naive blunders. My messages will be honest and likely profane. I hope you’re a little interested.

11:27 pm | 2 comments

At the end of the day, del.icio.us isn’t about storing URLs, it’s about finding new things on the web that you wouldn’t have found otherwise, using common ways of thinking to identify peers that you want to share with. In other words, you might be interested in other things that someone else tags the same way. The point is to share and gather from a wide group of people also surfing. (this is a horrible explanation, but it’s the best I can do at 2:15 AM)

Well, Yahoo unveiled My Web 2.0, their social bookmarking service that combines some features that only a Yahoo or Google could pull together. It looks less useful to me than del.icio.us, but I think that’s because the target use is different than the del.icio.us case. I thought I would point it out, though, in case any of you end up liking it better than del.icio.us. It has APIs, too, so there’s something else to play around with.

2:17 am | 1 comment

While the link is in last night’s link dump, I think the issue is important enough to break out into it’s own post. The Republican Chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce has sent letters out to the scientists whose research forms a critical part of the third IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR). The IPCC is the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the TAR is their periodic report on the state of research into global climate change. This report, specifically some of the studies cited in it, found that there was significant evidence that the global climate had warmed in this century and that the change was caused by human factors. The study is controversial among those that believe global warming doesn’t exist. Others have issues with the methodology of the study.

The interesting thing is that with all things the Republicans do (or, I should say, politicians in control of both Congress and the White House do), this seems to be a coordinated event. A few days ago, the Wall Street Journal Op-Ed section opened fire on the same study. Congress also has been working on the energy bill which contains little climate change policy and in general chooses for the U.S. to go it alone. Not surprising considering the administration.

The Journal OpEd makes the same claims as the Congressman, so read the RealClimate article for a rundown of the issues.

What makes the Congressman’s move pretty patently biased is that he hasn’t requested similar information from the other side of the debate. If the Committee was interested in learning about the issue, they would probably ask both sides to prepare defenses of their research since both sides have already responded to each other in various studies and articles. The Committee could just read those if they were interested in the research. Instead, they’ve identified the key scientists behind the studies in the IPCC TAR and decided to harass them. Why does the committee need background information on the funding that the scientists have received unless they’re “suggesting” that an investigation is possible?

What the hell is going on in our country?

11:51 am | 1 comment
1:17 am | 2 comments

The Republicans are apparently warning MLB about selling the Washington Nationals to a ownership group that includes George Soros. You might remember that Soros was a major donor to some of the groups opposing President Bush. He believed (and even wrote a book about) the dangers inherent in Bush’s foreign policy.

“I think Major League Baseball understands the stakes,” said Government Reform Chairman Tom Davis (R), the Northern Virginia lawmaker who recently convened high-profile steroid hearings. “I don’t think they want to get involved in a political fight.”

Davis, whose panel also oversees District of Columbia issues, said that if a Soros sale went through, “I don’t think it’s the Nats that get hurt. I think it’s Major League Baseball that gets hurt. They enjoy all sorts of exemptions” from anti-trust laws.

The goddamn “Government Reform Chairman” is advocating partisan cronyism. WTF? I mean, seriously, where the hell are we in this country that this is acceptable? I think it’s time to rethink how we deal with issues like this… it’s unbelievable that this is acceptable in our country. We’re behaving more and more like the piddly third-world banana republics we often mock.

More information on the rank hypocrisy of this all at Stone Court.

1:23 pm | 1 comment
1:17 am | leave a comment

I’ve been working on cleaning up some of this code which was part of the delay. Here is this week’s sports buzz as identified by bloggers. Click on the “Read Blogs” link if you want to read the commentary.

Sports Buzz for 6/19/2005-6/25/2005

16 - IRL - F1 prez calls Danica, but repeats sexist remark [Read Blogs]
10 - F1 - Tire flap reduces United States GP field to six [Read Blogs]
10 - Page 2 - Page 2’s Sneaker Tournament [Read Blogs]
8 - NBA - NBA, players’ union agree to new labor deal [Read Blogs]
8 - Page 2 - The Sports Guy: Big Shot Bob [Read Blogs]
7 - http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2005/series?series=detsas [Read Blogs]
5 - http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=250623024 [Read Blogs]
5 - http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/index [Read Blogs]
5 - NBA - NBA close to labor peace, new age minimum [Read Blogs]
5 - NBA/PLAYOFFS2005 - Shaq convo: Kobe who? [Read Blogs]
5 - GAMMONS - Gammons: Ahead of their time [Read Blogs]
4 - F1 - Fans outraged by tire flap at U.S. Grand Prix [Read Blogs]
4 - NHL - Frei: NHL should start from scratch [Read Blogs]
4 - NBA/PLAYOFFS2005 - Stein: A Game 7 for the ages [Read Blogs]
4 - http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/simmons/index [Read Blogs]
4 - GOLF/USOPEN05 - Maisel: Rise of a champion [Read Blogs]
4 - http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=250619008 [Read Blogs]
4 - http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/standings [Read Blogs]
3 - http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/gamecast?gameId=250619008 [Read Blogs]
3 - http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/index [Read Blogs]

4:29 pm | leave a comment

Further proof that Karl Rove is a jackass:

Rove Was Wrong

In the wake of Karl Rove’s divisive comments about liberals and conservatives and their response to the 9/11 attacks, Mystery Pollster looks back at polling data and finds “overwhelming majorities of both Democrats and Republicans believed America was ‘at war’ and favored some sort of ‘military action.’”

In addition, CBS News pollsters released their cross tabulations of a poll done two weeks after 9/11 to break out response by ideology. The result: “84% of self-described liberals supported ‘military action’ against the terrorists and 75% supported ‘going to war with a nation that is harboring those responsible.’”

[from Taegan Goddard's Political Wire]

Look, I’m all for explaining political differences and defending your opinions by explaining how the other side gets it wrong. I do have trouble believing that Rove, however, didn’t know this polling data. So, either he was lying to make a point or he’s really bad at his job. Which do you think?

3:20 am | 5 comments
1:17 am | leave a comment

Sideways (Widescreen Edition)

Heidi and I finally saw Sideways last night on DVD, complete with a glass of wine for Heidi. The wine was an important touch, since this movie is set in the wineries of California.

The two main characters, Miles and Jack, are heading up to the vineyards for a week long wine tasting and golf trip to get away before Jack’s wedding the following Saturday. Miles is an English teacher, divorced and a writer trying to get a book published. He’s dorky and a wine connoisseur. Jack is an actor who once had a role in a major soap opera who now does voiceovers in commercials. Miles is looking forward to the wines and the vineyards. Jack, on the other hand, plans on sleeping with some woman, any woman really. They end up meeting two women and go out with them. The rest of the movie follows them along the week as we watch Miles try to regain his confidence and Jack come to terms with the end of bachelorhood.

The movie is one of those that you watch the whole way through without consciously wondering what happens next. I had no anticipation about how it was going to end but I wasn’t bored either. It’s like watching a baseball or basketball game where you don’t care about either team and where nothing spectacular happens. It has some good moments, it remains competitive throughout, and the better team wins by a little bit in the end. That’s pretty much this movie. I didn’t really identify with the two main characters, didn’t really care about them much, but because they weren’t plastic and were played by good actors, I kept watching and enjoyed it. The ending, while not your typical happy ending, is still one where things turn out alright for Miles and Jack.

It’s a good movie for a quiet evening at home but there’s nothing remarkable enough to make me say, “You have to go see this movie.” And that’s probably the biggest flaw in the whole thing. If you have an opportunity to see this, you should see it. Don’t feel too bad if you miss it, though. It’ll be on cable soon enough and you’ll get to see it there (though the funniest and most surprising moment of the film will be edited out on basic cable).

Rating: 6.5/10

4:01 pm | leave a comment
1:18 am | leave a comment

Kim points out an article that shows that major advertisers are clients of adware companies… they choose to advertise on adware. I’ve often wondered if adware advertisers were simply third parties using affiliate style programs to earn money. Looks like some major companies may actually be intentionally using adware…

12:37 am | leave a comment

Karl Rove is a jackass.

I think at some point it becomes a question of why people want to win elections. To win? Or to do something?

For some, it’s about some level of patriotism or idealism that starts the ball rolling. For others it’s about dealing with a particular issue, whether it be high taxes, an environmental disaster, or dealing with a foreign threat. Then, I think, there is the craven lot that simply craves power and craves winning for it’s own sake. It is this lot that believes that winning divisively is no worse than winning on ideas. It’s a member of this lot that would denigrate the patriotism or loyalty of half of our country simply because they disagree with his policy. It’s a selfish, short-sighted politician who just wants to win with no concern about how his actions affect the nation at large.

Karl Rove, in my opinion is one of those selfish, craven, short-sighted politicians who could care less about the long tern health of our nation in order to win the next election. His recent comments were beyond the pale for a person in government. On top of that, they were hateful and ignorant. Numerous bloggers have pointed out that New York City is a relatively liberal town. It’s a Democratic city. To claim that a majority of the residents of that city wanted to “offer therapy and understanding for our attackers” after 9/11 insults all Americans.

But the sad thing is that this isn’t about “different philosophies and our different approaches” to the war on terror. There’s nothing illustrative about Rove’s comments or his candidates’ tactics. They don’t inform you. They don’t enlighten you. They aren’t about actually convincing anyone of anything. Instead, it’s simply about winning the election just to win. Not because they actually think they have a better plan for the problems of the day, but simply because winning is fun.

It makes me sad that this is all modern politics is about. It saddens me more that Rove and the Republicans have perfected this to the point that they can get away with claiming that 48% of the country hates America. That people that opposed going to war in Iraq are sympathizers with the terrorists that attacked our nation. There has to be line, right? I mean, at what point is the cost of winning by dividing America not worth paying? I wish we had a government that actually tried to improve voter approval by improving their policies or their execution. Instead, we get these idiots who simply fan the flames of division in order to distract people from their mistakes.

In a weird twist, but one that fits the pattern I’m describing here, it looks like the RNC and the White House may have planned this little firestorm knowing the controversy it would kick up. It’s sketchy, but it’s interesting to see the Republicans responding to this.

This was probably incoherent because I’m tired and annoyed. So, I’ll finish with some thoughts from the folks that are better writers than me.

From the Daou Report:

I’m devoting much of today’s report to Karl Rove’s vile comments denigrating half of the American public. My office overlooks Ground Zero, and I’m looking at the gaping footprint as I write this. My wife and I were in New York that day, on our way to the WTC for a morning meeting. A chance phone call dragged on a few minutes too long and most likely saved our lives. I lost friends in the towers, and when I walk past the site, as I do almost every evening, the pain is as real as it was on September 11th, 2001.

I spent my youth in Beirut during the height of Lebanon’s civil war, and I fought the Syrian presence in Lebanon long before the “Cedar Revolution.” I watched young boys give their lives and mothers cradle their dying children in blood-soaked arms. I’ve seen more bloodshed, war, and violence, and shot more guns than most of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists combined. I wouldn’t presume to question the strength or dignity of a stranger, and I pity those who blithely push the right=strong, left=weak rhetoric. It says far more about their inadequacies than it does about the target of their scorn. Today, Karl Rove took that rhetoric to a new, filthy low.

and, appropriately snarky from Atrios:

For the record, my motives aren’t to get more troops killed. If those were my motives I’d ship them off to a war on false pretenses without sufficient equipment to keep them safe.

(thx to Atrios and AmericaBlog for most of the links above)

2:05 am | leave a comment