The Kerry/Edwards campaign released a book length outline of their plans if elected. I started skimming the section on health care, the issue that comes up most around here. The two things I’ve come away with so far is that it’s essentially their stump speech with lots more details and that the numbers they’re quoting are over many years. Of course, I’ve only read 4 pages out of 263, but I’d invite people to take a stab at sections they are interested in, reading the whole thing, and posting comments. I’m curious if it actually goes into detail.
As I was reading this, I was also thinking about whether there is some sort of secrecy motivation when releasing stuff like this. I mean, is it a bad thing (and would it even happen) if your opponent’s campaign picked up some ideas from a real outline of a plan and adopted them? Would they even do it? If campaigns did snag good ideas from each other, would that be good for the public? A proxy for actually sitting down and working out issues, maybe?





August 11th, 2004 at 3:22 AM
You are an idiot if you think that other political parties are going to base their platforms off of another party’s book. Of course parties will listen to the people about issues. You don’t realize that?
You also fail to realize that there is no “fraudulent advertising” in the media in favor for conservatives or republicans. If anything, the media is promoting the far left(liberals). Don’t believe me? Watch ABC’s Dan Rather. You cannot possibly sit there and tell anybody to their face that that is not biased. Fair and balanced? No.
You are obviously a rookie in politics and need to look further into facts before you keep “blogging” about how unfair democrats are treated in this country. You will find that most(99%) of it is simply false.
And don’t get offended by this and show your ignorance by flaming me for this post — show you are willing to see both sides, and look further into the real issues. If you want you can e-mail me for additional information. I look forward to enlightening you in politics.
Thanks for reading.
August 11th, 2004 at 8:44 AM
Dan Rather isn’t on ABC…
August 11th, 2004 at 11:07 AM
I’ll gladly “see both sides” and “look further into the real issues” as soon as you provide some facts, rather than just bald assertions. Frankly, the “Rather is on ABC” comment doesn’t do much for your credibility. As for being an “idiot” to believe “other political parties are going to base their platforms off of another party’s book” — um, isn’t that what Clinton was great at doing? Taking “Republican” ideas (welfare reform, balanced budget, etc.), modifying them some, and then claiming credit? (”Republican” is in quotes, because, frankly, I see two Republican parties. Fiscal conservatives and religious, social conservatives. Yes, there’s some overlap, but I would argue that Bush is the latter, and definitely not the former.)
August 11th, 2004 at 11:47 AM
i honestly doubt he’s coming back (but he’s welcome if he wants and is willing to talk about stuff)…